Skip to main content

FOMC Rate Decision - "See it to believe it" and "Higher for Longer"

The FOMC kept the interest rate unchanged at 5.25% - 5.50% and retained the dot plot for 2023 at 5.60%. Market is now pricing in 14.50 bps of rate hikes into 2023 from pre FOMC 11.50 bps. The median projections were revised higher by 50 bps for 2024 and 2025 to 5.10% ( June 4.60%) and 3.60% ( June 3.10%) while retaining longer run projections for Fed Fund Rates at 2.50%. 

Markets repriced the 2024 FFR from 4.62% pre FOMC to 4.76%. Market pricing is now in divergence from Fed's guided path by 34 bps. This makes the data on inflation, employment, consumer spending extremely critical and could add to choppiness going forward. On rate cuts, markets are pricing in 25 bps of rate cuts by June of 2024 and another 50 bps of rate cuts by Dec 2024.

Interestingly, the estimates of GDP were revised higher by 110 bps for 2023 and 40 bps for 2024 with long run estimates for GDP retained at 1.80%. Unemployment (U/R) was revised lower by 30 bps for 2023 and 40 bps for 2024 and 2025. Headline PCE inflation was revised a tad bit higher (10 bps) for 2023 to 3.30% and Core PCE inflation was revised 20 bps lower. 

So the median thinking of FOMC centers on higher for longer rates, strong economic growth momentum in line with long run potential GDP growth and lower natural rate of unemployment with moderate inflation. 


The question naturally arises 

a. What would make the Fed think the FFR is sufficiently restrictive to not warrant another hike
b. For how long the Fed would keep the rates at restrictive levels 
c. When does the restrictive rate start biting into the economic activity to warrant cuts
d. And the magnitude of cuts. 

The economic outlook faces uncertainty from looming government shutdown, the end of federal childcare funding, resumption of student debt payments, rising oil prices and auto strike. 

Take away from the press conference could be summed up as Fed would like to see conclusive evidence which points to a declining trend in inflation rather than rely on 3 months of encouraging data ( Jun - Aug) and a better balanced labor market to determine if policy is at sufficiently restrictive levels. Fed would want to follow a measured approach to decision making. The decision to upward revise 2024 FFR by 50 bps was driven not by concerns of persistent inflation but stronger economic activity. The neutral rate, policy rate considered neither stimulating or restricting economic growth may have moved higher. 



Comments